PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CYH.TO vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CYH.TO^GSPC
YTD Return8.65%11.18%
1Y Return17.26%26.33%
3Y Return (Ann)3.94%8.72%
5Y Return (Ann)5.49%13.16%
10Y Return (Ann)5.78%10.99%
Sharpe Ratio1.472.38
Daily Std Dev11.68%11.54%
Max Drawdown-61.47%-56.78%
Current Drawdown-0.19%-0.09%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between CYH.TO and ^GSPC is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CYH.TO vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CYH.TO achieves a 8.65% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 11.18% return. Over the past 10 years, CYH.TO has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 5.78%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 10.99% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


100.00%150.00%200.00%250.00%300.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
105.72%
286.20%
CYH.TO
^GSPC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

S&P 500

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CYH.TO vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CYH.TO) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CYH.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CYH.TO, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.24
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CYH.TO, currently valued at 1.81, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.81
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CYH.TO, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.22
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CYH.TO, currently valued at 0.78, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.78
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CYH.TO, currently valued at 3.60, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.003.60
^GSPC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 2.53, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.53
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 3.57, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.57
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.45
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 2.04, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.04
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 9.58, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.009.58

CYH.TO vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CYH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CYH.TO and ^GSPC.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.24
2.53
CYH.TO
^GSPC

Drawdowns

CYH.TO vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CYH.TO drawdown since its inception was -61.47%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYH.TO and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-3.90%
-0.09%
CYH.TO
^GSPC

Volatility

CYH.TO vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CYH.TO) and S&P 500 (^GSPC) have volatilities of 3.26% and 3.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
3.26%
3.36%
CYH.TO
^GSPC